Corporate Debt Restructuring Mechanism– An Overview

By Snehal Hota

Corporate Debt Restructuring or CDR is a willful procedure under which banks and money related organizations help those organizations, who are confronting budgetary challenges because of inner or outside variables, to rebuild their obligations. CDR is a non-statutory procedure. The rationale behind this system is to give opportune help to the organizations and re-store them. Another thought process is to secure the enthusiasm of the partner, speculators, and different gatherings who are going about as moneylenders to such undertakings. CDR is accessible to those organizations which have profited credit office from more than one money related foundation. These monetary meet up to help the organization to serve all the intrigue parties.

The idea of rebuilding comes into picture when an organization is confronting money related troubles, and because of which, it is very nearly bankruptcy. Rebuilding an organization is done when the business activities completed by the organization is suitable, yet at the same time attributable to certain elements, it is causing misfortunes. These elements can be an adjustment in government arrangement, change of financing costs, change in the estimation of money, and so forth these variables are clearly outside the ability to control of the organization. The essential target of CDR is to keep up the feasibility of the organization over the long haul with the goal that invested individuals don’t cause any misfortunes. The intrigue parties go into various game plans with the organization like trading their obligation for some number of offers (alluded to as obligation value swap), or swearing off a piece of the advance, or the invested individuals consent to a fixed ban period where both the gatherings number of offers (alluded to as obligation value swap), or swearing off a piece of the advance, or the invested individuals consent to a fixed ban period where both the gatherings don’t initiate any activity against one another during the said period.

CDR should be possible in various manners. Inclination offers can be changed over into value shares; generally speaking obligations can be changed over into shares, a piece of obligation can be postponed by the loan bosses, Inter-Creditor Agreements can be altered, unforeseen cases can be revalued and settled, and resources and liabilities can be redistributed. CDR incorporates various stages, for example, settling on an understanding between the gatherings, thought of the proposition between the gatherings and giving extra assets to the organization at a higher pace of enthusiasm by the moneylenders with the goal that the organization can carry on its business exercises and don’t get bankrupt.


The idea of CDR was acquainted with the India when in the year 2001, the RBI thought of specific rules to be trailed by banks and other money related organizations. The RBI ex-pressed that the idea of CDR is a non-statutory and intentional procedure where if 75% of the leasers (by esteem) choose to help the organization, the other 25% of the loan bosses will likewise have the consent to help the organization through the procedure of CDR. CDR is accessible just to those organizations which have numerous financial balances and has assumed acknowledgment from different loan specialists. Additionally, the exceptional measure of obligation of the considerable number of banks and loan specialists ought to be 100 million or above in total. It covers all classifications of advantages ordered by the RBI as far as prudential resources grouping principles. Cases which are recorded with the Debt Recovery Tribunal, The Bureau of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction or some other case are equipped for reproduction under CDR. A bank or a money related foundation can allude for CDR on the off chance that it has a 20% offer in working capital or term credit of the company.

The significant advantage a loan boss has from rebuilding obligations is that they can de-crease the non-performing resources of an organization through it.


· Taking a gander at the ongoing patterns, numerous framework organizations like steel and iron organizations are at the highest point of the CDR list. One reason for this can be that because of the easing back economy, the assembling area is somewhat down.

 · An ongoing pattern which can be seen is that open segment banks have been progressively merciful that the private area banks in endorsing CDR bundles. One of the significant disadvantages of the current CDR Mechanism is that the advertiser chief’s close to home assurance to the whole rebuilding procedure is liable to abuse.

 · Another weakness of the present component identifies with the liberal change of obligation into value, which is regularly permitted by the banks. This places them in an impeded circumstance.

· Small banks whine that their expert advantages are not taken consideration on account of the idea of the rules that on the off chance that 75% of the leasers by esteem favor of the bundle, at that point it is authoritative on the remainder of the loan bosses moreover.

· Understanding the issues- The RBI concocted some new rules for the procedure of CDR. For instance, as per the new guidelines, advertisers of the organization are currently required to acquire progressively number of value shares, which needs to store in an escrow account till the time the organization is in the groove again once more.


Clause 15 of the National Directives in Exhibit P2 Order mandating the use of the application, Arogya Setu takes away the right of a person to decide and control the use of information about him. He is forced to give away data to a system that he may or may not approve of, thereby attacking his right of informational autonomy. Autonomy guaranteed by the Constitution of India also grants an individual freedom not to take part in activities he does not approve of.

Moreover, the Government order has vaguely used the term workplace which needs to be interpreted in terms of the Kerala High Court judgment in Essar Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd v State of Kerala where it was held that “Going by the concept of worker, either he must be employed in a manufacturing process or in cleaning any machinery or premises used for a manufacturing process or any work which is incidental or connected with the manufacturing process.”

Thirdly, Section 58 of the Disaster Management Act 2005 imposes penal action upon employers of enterprises if their employees do not comply with the directive of usage of Arogya Setu. This is arbitrary to the extent that no penal action can be imposed on anyone having no Mens Rea. An employer who has only a work relationship with an employee cannot compel the employee to install a mobile application and use it diligently and to provide his personal information to the domain.

At the heart of the viability of the Aarogya Setu app is its accessibility. Unlike other countries, the Aarogya Setu app also operates in a country where smart phone penetration is extremely low. According to a 2019 report by Pew Research Centre, smart phone penetration stands at a dismal 24% in India. In addition to this, issues of poor data connectivity and frequent electricity outages, particularly in the more remote regions of rural India continue to plague extensive usage of smart phones.

There are also no clearly defined legal mechanisms to protect citizen’s right to privacy and personal data in India and no legislation that can hold the government accountable for using plague extensive usage of smart phones.

There are also no clearly defined legal mechanisms to protect citizen’s right to privacy and personal data in India and no legislation that can hold the government accountable for using our data. The Personal Data Protection Bill, which intends to safeguard the privacy rights of citizens was introduced by the Indian government in 2019. However, it still needs to be assessed by the Joint Parliamentary Committee. There is also a serious absence of anchoring legislation, i.e., lack of a legislative framework to safeguard the interest of its users which points out the larger question of consent being obtained forcefully in the present case. Moreover as per the Aadhaar Case judgment the government does not have any legal backing to issue a direction to use Aarogya Setu App compulsorily as it has been stated in the judgment that “without the explicit backing of law right to privacy enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India cannot be restricted especially when the right to consent is taken away.”

In light of the aforementioned serious procedural violations and flaws, blithely mandating Aarogya Setu in one sentence through an executive decree tears the constitutional architecture to shreds. The present case is a classic example of rule by executive, instead of the rule by and of law.


The government directive mandating Aarogya Setu for all public and private employees suffers from serious legal flaws. In light of the recent developments, the words of the UN Privacy Chief Joseph Cannataci again hold importance, “Dictatorships and authoritarian societies often start in the face of a threat. That is why it is important to be vigilant today and not give away all our freedoms.”In the present case, if there is a breach of data here, who is answerable, what action has to be taken and (who is) accountable for the data breach. While the app may help us fight Covid-19, it also has the very real potential to produce anti-democratic, exclusionary, discriminatory practices and structures at a larger scale.In these challenging times, even the impression that the basic principles and rights, as mentioned by the author, are being compromised by an executive decree, can seriously damage the public trust and confidence on which rests the reputation of the democratic governments. Once that is lost, there will be no value in the system left.


While the CDR Mechanism has demonstrated valuable by and large, there is still a ton of degree for improving the component. Numerous issues despite everything exist, for example, remote leasers would prefer not to be a piece of CDR Mechanism in India since they think, it’ll be good towards the Indian gatherings. The enthusiasm of the little gatherings ought to likewise be dealt with. Additionally, many rebuilt cases transform into awful resources in this way. Another significant issue is that the new CDR rules don’t accommodate part explicit loaning and give expansive rules, and subsequently this may prompt out of line need segment loaning to hardly any zones forgetting about the rest.

However, suffers from serious legal problems and thus, invited serious criticism from the le-gal fraternity and general masses as well. These National Directives were challenged in a Writ Petition filed by John Daniel, General Secretary of Thrissur District Congress Committee, in the High Court of Kerala as violative of right to privacy and personal autonomy, as explained by the Supreme Court in the KS Puttaswamy decision. Similarly, Former Supreme Court Judge BN Srikrishna, who chaired the committee that came out with the first draft of the Personal Data Protection Bill, termed the government’s push mandating the use of Aarogya Setu app “utterly illegal” on the ground that it was not backed by any law.

Leave a Reply